Dobsonian and Newtonian telescopes are both types of reflector telescopes, utilizing mirrors rather than lenses to collect, focus, and direct light. They have similarities in their optical design, but also key differences when it comes to their size, mounts, tracking capabilities, ideal use cases and more. Determining which type of telescope is the right fit depends significantly on the user‘s needs and astronomical interests.
Brief History of Reflector Telescopes
Before comparing Dobsonians and Newtonians head-to-head, it helps to understand the history and operating principles behind reflector telescopes which both types belong to.
Invention of Reflector Telescopes
Reflector telescopes were invented by Scottish mathematician James Gregory in the 17th century. He proposed a design using concave primary and secondary mirrors. However, it was Isaac Newton who successfully built the first practical reflecting telescope in 1668.
Newton experimented with various metals and configurations to improve upon refracting telescope designs which struggled with color distortions from light dispersion. By using curved mirrors rather than lenses, the light distortions could be better controlled.
How Reflector Telescopes Work
Reflector telescopes use mirrors to collect, focus and direct light rather than the lenses used in a refracting telescope. Light enters the open end of the telescope tube and hits the large primary mirror at the bottom. This parabolic mirror reflects the light back up toward a small secondary mirror near the top opening which then diverts the light into the eyepiece.
Collimation is Critical
The alignment of the two mirrors is critical to ensure the light is reflected and focused properly. This alignment process is called collimation. Newtonian reflectors in particular need occasional collimation (also called "re-collimation") to fine tune the mirrors as they can get bumped out of alignment when moving or transporting the telescope.
Key Differences Between Dobsonians and Newtonians
Now that we‘ve covered some fundamentals around reflector telescopes, let‘s explore the main differences between the two most common types – the Dobsonian and Newtonian:
Size and Portability
One of the most noticeable differences is in the size and resulting portability. Dobsonian telescopes are much larger – often triple the size of a Newtonian with an equivalent diameter mirror due to their optical tube and mount design. The large base and simplified mount of a Dobsonian also means they are best suited for transport between fixed observation locations rather than frequent portability.
In contrast, Newtonian telescopes are more compact and portable overall, while still offering impressive light gathering capability through their parabolic primary mirror. The optical tube can be detached from the tripod and mount for transport. This makes them the preferred choice if you need to move locations regularly or pack it for astronomy camping trips.
Mount Design
Another key differentiator focuses on the mount design. Dobsonians utilize a simple altazimuth mount consisting of a rotating ground platform with limited tracking movement along vertical and horizontal axes. This results in a lower cost but does mean manual adjustment is needed to track objects across the night sky as the Earth rotates.
Newtonians tend to use higher precision equatorial mounts which have an axis aligned to match the Earth‘s allowing for motorized tracking. Once properly polar aligned, motors drive the rotation in right ascension and declination to match the night sky motion. This allows the user to track celestial objects automatically without manual intervention.
Focal Length and Focal Ratio
The different optical tube assembly sizes lead to different focal lengths between Dobsonian and Newtonian telescopes.
Dobsonians have longer focal lengths – often around 1200mm or more allowing high magnification with standard eyepieces suited for visual observation. They tend to have Focal Ratios around f/5 or f/6.
Newtonians have shorter focal lengths to maintain a compact optical tube size aiming for fast focal ratios ideal for astrophotography such as f/4 or f/5. Their faster optical design maximizes light transmission.
Ideal Use Cases
Their differing attributes make Dobsonian and Newtonian telescopes better suited for specific astronomical activities:
-
Dobsonians excel at visual observation – their large aperture mirrors combined with long focal lengths provide bright, high-magnification views of planets, moon, and wide deep sky objects that can be manually tracked.
-
Newtonians are ideal for astrophotography – their fast focal ratios, compact optical assemblies and equatorial mounts with tracking motors allow capturing galaxies, nebulae and nightscapes. Some manual guiding may still be required depending on tracking accuracy.
In essence, Dobsonians favor visual use while Newtonians optimize for photography. There are exceptions, but most designs align to these primary intents.
8 Must-Know Facts Comparing Dobsonian and Newtonian Telescopes
To summarize the major points differentiating Dobsonian vs. Newtonian telescopes:
-
Both designs are reflector telescopes, utilizing mirrors rather than lenses.
-
Dobsonians use simpler altazimuth mounts allowing point and view simplicity without complex setup.
-
Newtonians use higher-precision equatorial mounts providing motorized tracking capability once aligned.
-
Dobsonians have longer focal lengths yielding high magnification views through eyepieces.
-
Newtonians have shorter focal lengths for faster optical systems suited to photography.
-
Dobsonians require manual tracking by adjusting orientation as the object moves across the sky.
-
Newtonians can self-track objects electronically using motors and gears.
-
Dobsonians are generally less expensive thanks to their simplified mounts. More accessories or high-precision mounts can increase Newtonian costs significantly.
Understanding these core differentiators will help assess which design is better aligned to your goals and experience level.
Pros and Cons Comparison
| Dobsonian Telescope | Newtonian Telescope | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Less expensive | More expensive models |
| Portability | Bulkier, not portable | Compact, transportable |
| Mount Type | Alt-azimuth | Equatorial |
| Tracking | Manual | Motorized |
| Setup Complexity | Very easy | Moderate |
| Ideal Use | Visual observing | Astrophotography |
| Magnification Power | Very high | Moderate |
As shown in this comparison table, both designs have advantageous and disadvantages that suit different applications. Rarely would a single telescope excel equally at visual observation magnifying power AND astrophotography.
Recommending the Best Telescope For You
When choosing between a Dobsonian or Newtonian telescope, start by considering how you intend to use it most. Dobsonians shine for manual visual observing thanks to large mirrors and smooth motions. Newtonians automated tracking features enable long exposure deep sky photography.
Those new to astronomy may favor an entry level Dobsonian for simplicity and bright views that ignite passion for the hobby. Beginners can manually track planets, moon and bright Messier objects as skills advance before adding photography capability later with a guide scope and mount.
More experienced astrophotographers will appreciate the motorized equatorial mounts and compact optical tubes Newtonian telescopes provide when coupled to cameras and telescopes. Simple set up and portability also helps when traveling to ideal dark sky locations.
While the lines blur a bit with fork mounted Newtonian designs opting for manual Dobsonian mounts, these core guidelines provide a sound starting point.
When unboxing and setting up for first light, the advantages of Dobsonian or Newtonian will become clearer. Just beware upgraditis danger awaits in astronomy gear once key features important to your observing interests are better understood!
