Electric vehicles (EVs) have grown steadily in popularity over the last decade. Many prospective buyers considering an EV are weighing factors like driving range, performance, charging speed, interior space, and advanced features when deciding between models. As EV options widen, it becomes helpful to closely compare offerings from both established and new automakers alike.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E and Hyundai Ioniq 5 represent two recent entries from legacy brands that illustrate how the EV marketplace continues to expand. Each vehicle brings intriguing capabilities but cater to slightly different consumer priorities. Let’s examine some key factors side-by-side to help determine which of these new electric SUVs aligns better to your needs.
Overview of the Mach-E and Ioniq 5
The Mustang Mach-E is Ford’s first fully electric crossover SUV, blending performance inspirations from the iconic Mustang sport coupe with cutting edge battery technology and an eco-friendly platform. Unveiled in late 2019 and hitting dealerships in 2021, the Mach-E aims to be a sporty long range EV that can still handle family and cargo duties.
The Ioniq 5 is Hyundai’s first model built on the dedicated E-GMP architecture, optimized specifically for battery powered vehicles. Hyundai debuted the creased retro-futuristic crossover in early 2021 to positive reception for its quirky styling and abundant tech features.
So while both rated as midsize electric SUVs, the Mustang echoes permeate the Mach-E DNA more while the Ioniq 5 leans into ultra-efficient mobility. But diving deeper across critical categories from pricing to predicted reliability reveals how close the two vehicles remain, though with each still retaining standout elements.
Exterior Styling and Design
Beauty resides in the eye of the beholder, but important distinctions separate the exterior profiles.
Mach-E Styling
- Athletic, coupe-like shape stands out from blocky SUVs
- Aggressive fascia and front grille treatment
- Crisp shoulder lines and fastback roofline
- 18- or 20-inch wheel options depending on trim
- Hidden rear door handles
Ioniq 5 Styling
- Pixelated motifs and creased edges provide retro vibe
- Smooth, rounded front end and notchback profile
- Parametric pixel LED elements grab attention
- Standard 19-inch aero wheels, 20-inch available
- Small front splitter enhances aerodynamics
Dimensions are quite close between the two, but the Mustang-inspired Mach-E exterior skews more performance focused in its silhouette. For buyers wanting styling that stretches convention, the Ioniq 5 delivers on its concept car looks.
Exterior Dimensions Comparison
| Dimension | Mach-E | Ioniq 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 186 in | 182.5 in |
| Width | 74 in | 74.4 in |
| Height | 63 in | 63.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 117 in | 118.1 in |
| Ground Clearance | 5.7-6 in | 5.9 in |
Target Buyer Profile
Mach-E: Younger, performance-oriented demographic seeking an SUV with impressive acceleration and handling.
Ioniq 5: Eco-focused buyers who want visual flair signaling environmental commitment.
Interior Space and Cargo Capacity
As electric platforms continue to evolve, EV interiors no longer need to skimp on roominess.
The Mach-E seats up to 5 passengers comfortably with its flat floor battery design opening interior volume. The Ioniq 5 also fits 5 but positions its battery packs underneath the rear seats in a center tunnel layout.
Up front, the Ioniq 5 does carve out a bit more headroom while the Mach-E opens up extra legroom. In back, rear passengers enjoy ample space in both vehicles to avoid feeling cramped.
For hauling gear or running family errands, flexible cargo arrangements create roomy storage with the rear seats folded down. The frunk (front trunk) adds bonus capacity up front as well in both EVs.
Cargo and Storage Comparison
| Spec | Mach-E | Ioniq 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Front Trunk | 4.8 cu ft | 5.2 cu ft |
| Rear Seats Up | 29 cu ft | 27 cu ft |
| Rear Seats Down | 59.7 cu ft | 59.3 cu ft |
| Max Tow Rating | 2000 lbs | 1600 lbs |
So while cargo dimensions are quite similar, the Mach-E gains an edge for those needing to haul more on regular basis.
Interior Comfort Fit Visualized
Red = tight fit; Yellow = may brush against ceiling; Green = ample room
Range and Charging Capabilities
For electric vehicles, rated range and charging performance directly impact real world usability. Ford and Hyundai deliver compelling EV driving range to ease range anxiety:
Mach-E Range
| Trim | Range (mi) |
|---|---|
| Standard Range | 230 |
| Extended Range RWD | 310 |
| Extended Range AWD | 270 |
Ioniq 5 Range
| Trim | Range (mi) |
|---|---|
| SE RWD | 220 |
| SEL RWD | 303 |
| Limited AWD | 256 |
Benchmarks look at range estimates under ideal conditions, but driving style, terrain and weather can reduce real world results. However cold weather testing by reputable sources like Car & Driver found both EVs still delivered over 200 miles range in winter conditions.
For charging, Hyundai’s 800V electrical architecture allows its E-GMP platform to reach higher charge rates that significantly speed up charging session times.
Charging Comparison
| Spec | Mach-E | Ioniq 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charge Rate | 150 kW | 220 kW |
| 10-80% Charge Time | 45 min* | 18 min* |
*Based on optimal conditions using public DC fast charging station
So while the Mustang Mach-E meets the mark on range to enable long distance road trips, the Ioniq 5 clearly surpasses it when it comes to rapid charging convenience.
Performance and Handling Dynamics
In addition to off-the-line torquey acceleration inherent among EVs, both models back up their futuristic looks with legitimate performance.
The Mach-E again channels its Mustang namesake across elements like available Performance Edition upgrades, Ford’s MagneRide adaptive suspension offered on GT models, and tuning clearly oriented towards responsive engagement.
By comparison, the Ioniq 5 skews towards a tuned ride emphasizing stability and comfort over whip-quick reflexes. Its low center of gravity afforded by the flat battery pack aids handling, but won’t trick your senses into believing you’re behind the wheel of a sports car.
Horsepower and torque ratings do favor the Mustang Mach-E, especially when optioning the GT Performance trim boasting a staggering:
Mach-E GT Performance Highlights
- 0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds (Car & Driver)
- 634 lb-ft torque
- Top speed of 155 mph
- Performance brakes
- 20-inch wheels
Ioniq 5 Performance Ratings
- 0-60 mph in less than 5 seconds
- 446 lb-ft torque
- Top speed of 115 mph
- 19-inch wheels
So for pure acceleration and aggressive corner carving, the Mach-E clearly bests the Ioniq 5. Yet Hyundai’s SUV counterpunches with ultra-fast charging times that best its Ford rival.
Ride & Handling Verdict
Mach-E: Sportier dynamics across multiple trim levels backing up its Mustang sport coupe heritage. The preferred choice for driving enthusiasts.
Ioniq 5: Comfort-oriented tuning and suspension for relaxed cruising rather than white-knuckle performance.
Interior Styling and Technology Features
Modern minimalism characterizes both models‘ interior treatments, amplified by large panoramic dash displays. However closer examination reveals key distinctions in styling and features.
The Mach-E goes for a clean, uncluttered look organized into zones. Its 1-piece instrument panel sweeps down from dash to console. Premium editions gain contrast stitching and color accents for increased upscale ambience.
Alternatively, the Ioniq 5 interior centers around twin 12-inch screens joined as one continuous unit. Ambient lighting choices and sustainably-treated materials reinforce its environmentally-conscious mission.
In terms of features, you’ll find the latest tech goodies like wireless charging, multi-device Bluetooth connections, over-the-air updates and expansive touch displays across both EVs.
Infotainment & Tech Comparison
| Feature | Mach-E | Ioniq 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Touchscreen Size | 15.5 in | 12.3 in |
| Wireless Apple/Android | Yes | Yes |
| Digital Key | App only | Yes |
| Facial Recognition | No | Yes |
| OTA Updates | Yes | Yes |
| Sound System | 10 spkr B&O | 8 spkr Bose |
And for audiophile credibility, both brands partner with respected audio brands like Bang & Olufsen (Mach-E) and Bose (Ioniq 5) for upgraded listening experiences.
Safety & Driver Assistance Systems
With the rapid pace of advancement for automated driving aids over the last few years, EV startups and legacy brands alike cram their latest models with cutting edge collision avoidance and convenience technologies under the umbrella term ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems).
Ford packs the Mach-E with its latest Co-Pilot360 suite encompassing features like these:
Mach-E Safety Tech
- Automatic Emergency Braking
- Blindspot + Cross Traffic Alerts
- Lane Centering Assist
- Evasive Steering Assist
- Intersection Assist
Meanwhile Hyundai outfits the Ioniq 5 with counterpart safety aids through what it calls Hyundai SmartSense:
Ioniq 5 Safety Features
- Forward Collision Avoidance
- Blind Spot View Monitor
- Safe Exit Warning
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Driver Attention Warning
And both companies pledge continued improvements delivered via over-the-air update capability incorporated into these electric SUVs.
Cost to Own Factors
Upfront sticker prices signify only part of the equation determining overall cost and value perceptions across comparable vehicles. Factoring in elements like recurring fuel expenses and even projected resale value greatly shifts cost considerations, often in favor of EVs.
In terms of base pricing, Hyundai maintains something of an advantage by starting the Ioniq 5 at under $45k. But most buyers add options or upgrade to Limited versions lifting the price to around $50k – $55k. Meanwhile a nicely equipped Mustang Mach-E without the GT badge lands $52k – $60k depending on battery range and drivetrain configuration selected.
Federal tax credits of $7,500 provide relief for qualified Mach-E buyers. However Hyundai recently exceeded the phase-out threshold of 200,000 US EV sales. So by 2023, Ioniq 5 tax credits will likely be eliminated in the US.
Long term costs also come into play when weighing vehicular investments, especially predicted reliability. Here again EVs hold the advantage over internal combustion alternatives with far fewer components prone to wear and tear or needing maintenance.
Early dependability surveys and owner feedback points to Ford edging Hyundai for first year Mach-E reliability scores across measures like J.D. Power’s U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study. However Hyundai does best Ford in longer running brand studies for dependability.
For EVs, projected battery capacity deterioration over years of use provides another cost consideration. Based on factors like thermal management, total mileage warranties on the battery systems become significant indicators here.
Battery & Warranty Comparison
| Spec | Mach-E | Ioniq 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 68-88 kWh | 58-77 kWh |
| Battery Warranty | 100k mi / 8 yr | 100k mi / 10 yr |
| Overall Vehicle Warranty | 50k mi / 4 yr | 60k mi / 5 yr |
The verdict: Advantages in long term value tilt towards the Ioniq 5 when weighing total cost of ownership factors.
Final Recommendations
Both the Mustang Mach-E and Hyundai Ioniq 5 make compelling cases among a growing field of electric SUVs. The Mach-E brings home its performance bonafides and technology features you’d expect from the sticker price. Yet Hyundai’s reputation for value does shine through when weighing factors like ultra-fast charging, interior roominess competitive with far pricier opponents, and confident predicted reliability.
For the buyer prioritizing brand cachet and powerful acceleration, the Mach-E clearly carries the day. Its sporty temperament sells the Mustang ethos within an electric future. But if maximizing range between charges rates higher than minimzing 0-60 sprints, the Ioniq 5 warrants strong consideration.
Ultimately as the electric crossover field expands, Hyundai and Ford illustrate how legacy automakers continue to raise EV expectations on range, performance and tech capabilities alike. Whether your needs lean towards sporty sophistication or efficient practicality, the Mach-E and Ioniq 5 both succeed in their distinct missions.
