Skip to content

Hello Readers! Understanding Pure Virtual Functions in C++

How well do you grasp inheritance, polymorphism and other pillars of object-oriented programming? Mastering techniques like pure virtual functions is key to leveling up your C++ skills.

Let me walk you through pure virtuals with plenty of examples. I promise to shed light on all aspects using a fun, conversational style!

A Brief History of Polymorphism and Encapsulation

Before jumping into pure virtual functions, it helps to understand the concepts they support – polymorphism and encapsulation. These paradigms took time to evolve in C++…

In the early days, C++ lacked explicit features for polymorphic behavior or data abstraction. Inheritance hierarchies were rigid, coupling base and derived classes tightly…

By the mid-90s, the need for looser coupling via virtual functions became clear. But early virtuals still placed burdens like mandating overridden implementations in subclasses.

Pure virtuals arrived as an elegant means of enabling polymorphism while encouraging encapsulation. By providing interfaces, not implementations, pure virtuals shifted focus to abstraction virtues…

So What Exactly Are Pure Virtual Functions?

A pure virtual function provides a common interface without actual code. Subclasses override the interface by defining their own implementations. This enforces polymorphic design.

Here is an example pure virtual function syntax:

class Base {
public:
   virtual void function() = 0; 
};

The = 0 syntax marks function() as purely virtual. It has no Base class definition. Subclasses must override function() or they too become abstract classes…

Let‘s contrast pure virtual functions against regular virtuals:

Virtual Function Pure Virtual Function
Has default implementation No implementation provided
Overriding is optional Subclass *must* override
Class can instantiate Class cannot instantiate (abstract)

As we can see, pure virtuals enforce tighter polymorphic contracts in subclassing. Now let‘s look at some example code…

Employee Record System: A Usage Example

Say we are designing an employee records application. The system needs to handle different employee types – let‘s model this with abstraction via pure virtual functions…

First, we define a base Employee class representing a generic employee. This uses a pure virtual displayDetails() method to output employee record info:

class Employee {
public:
   virtual void displayDetails() = 0;    
};

Now we subclass Employee twice – once for full-time workers and once for freelancers:

class FullTimeEmployee : public Employee {
  // Overrides displayDetails() 
};

class Freelancer : public Employee {
   // Overrides displayDetails()
};

Since Employee declared displayDetails() purely virtually, FullTimeEmployee and Freelancer must override it themselves, like this:

// Inside FullTimeEmployee
void displayDetails() override {
  // Print full-time employee details   
}  

// Inside Freelancer
void displayDetails() override {
  // Print freelancer details
}

Now we can polymorphically handle employees:

FullTimeEmployee fte; 
Freelancer fre;

fte.displayDetails(); // Calls FullTimeEmployee version
fre.displayDetails(); // Calls Freelancer version

This enables specialized processing while abstracting away class details – the essence of encapsulation!

And there you have it – a primer on leveraging pure virtual functions for polymorphic design. Let‘s wrap up with some key takeaways…

Key Takeaways

  • Pure virtuals enforce overriding in subclasses via abstract interfaces
  • They enable polymorphism and loose coupling
  • Syntax is simple – just add ‘= 0‘ when declaring
  • Require override when implementing pure virtuals in subclasses
  • Allow common handling of subclasses through base pointers

And with that, you should have a solid grasp of the power of pure virtual functions in C++! Let me know if you have any other questions.

Happy coding!

Tags: