Skip to content

Hello There! Let‘s Compare the Motorola Moto G Pure and Moto G Stylus to Decide Which Budget Smartphone is Best for You

Smartphones have become such integral devices in our daily lives. Yet with flagship models now costing over $1000, finding an affordable phone without too many compromises can be challenging!

That‘s why I want to help you out by thoroughly comparing two of the top budget Android options on the market today – the Moto G Pure and Moto G Stylus from iconic phone maker Motorola.

In this comprehensive guide, we‘ll dive deep into all the metrics, features, and real-world performance factors that set these sub-$200 phones apart. My goal is to equip you with enough transparent information so deciding between the Moto G Pure and Moto G Stylus becomes much simpler. Let‘s get started!

A Brief History of Motorola‘s Value Phone Legacy

Motorola holds a special place in cellular history as a pioneer of early mobile phones. Way back in 1973, they demoed an archetypal brick handset design. And Motorola manufactured the first commercial cell phone – the DynaTAC 8000X – approval by the FCC in 1983.

Over the ensuing decades, Motorola continued releasing iconic and affordable phones like the ultrathin RAZR V3 flip phone. They also manufactured early Android models like the DROID line.

However in recent years though, Motorola‘s flagship phones took a backseat to brands like Apple and Samsung in terms of cutting-edge innovation and sales. But one space Motorola always remained competitive was the budget category.

Models like the Moto G and E series consistently earn praise as the best phones available for under $300. They cut the right corners to keep prices low without sabotaging everyday usability. As a result, Motorola currently captures over 15% of the North American prepaid phone market.

The recently launched Moto G Pure and Moto G Stylus continue this frugal value lineage. But even as pretty similar phones on the surface, they take different approaches to appeal to distinct types of cash-conscious consumers.

Next let‘s explore who exactly each phone best suits before examining their specs and performance more closely…

Who Are These Phones Designed For?

When conceptualizing the Moto G Pure and Moto G Stylus, Motorola‘s product teams definitely had different target users in mind. Getting a handle on these segments can clarify which phone aligns better with your priorities as a shopper.

The Moto G Pure appeals most to:

  • First-time smartphone owners
  • Tech novices less familiar with apps
  • Seniors seeking simple communication
  • Price-conscious shoppers on tight budgets
  • Parents buying phones for kids

Whereas the Moto G Stylus caters more to:

  • Mainstream Android phone users
  • Social media and content streaming fans
  • Mobile photographers/videographers
  • Casual gamers on a budget
  • Stylus note-takers and artists

So in summary, the Moto G Pure focuses on affordability and ease-of-use. The Moto G Stylus instead emphasizes performance and versatility. This manifests in many of their hardware and software decisions.

Now let‘s crunch the numbers on how Moto optimized each phone…

Pricing and Availability Details

As flagship phones now often cross the $1000 threshold, penny pinching shoppers have to look to budget segments to find decent mobile devices under $300. The Moto G Pure and Moto G Stylus fortunately fit that criteria.

Since its September 2021 launch, the Moto G Pure has held firm at a $159.99 MSRP. But through online sellers and carrier promotions, it can readily be purchased brand new for between $120 and $140. That‘s frankly an amazing price for a modern smartphone with decent baseline capabilities.

The OG Moto G Stylus first hit the scene back in March 2020 for $299. The latest 5th generation model maintains the same retail cost of $299. However, many vendors slash prices by $50 or more bringing this renewed Stylus down closer to the $200 point to spur sales.

You definitely pay a premium upfront for the Moto G Stylus over the Moto G Pure. But as we‘ll explore shortly, much improved performance and versatility rationalizes the extra cost for lots of buyers.

Design and Display Comparison

While both phones share 6.5 inch LCD displays, Motorola takes different design approaches with the Moto G Pure oriented towards compact styling while the Moto G Stylus values screen real estate.

Moto G Pure Design

Thanks to a teardrop notch and slim uniform bezels all around, the Moto G Pure maintains a modern profile with brushed metallic trim. At 169 grams and 9.1mm thin, it slots right into pockets. The plastic polymer backplate also repels fingerprints fairly well.

Moto G Stylus Design

On the other hand, thick bottom and top bezels give the Moto G Stylus slightly dated looks. But this thicker framing allows Motorola to incorporate the namesake stylus without forcing compromises elsewhere. Reasonably compact dimensions plus a grippy textured case back aid ergonomics.

Shared Display Attributes

Given their positioning as budget phones, both the Moto G Pure and G Stylus sport IPS LCD panels instead of pricier AMOLED tech. And max brightness is limited to around 400 nits – decent for indoor use but lacking compared to high-end phones pushing 1000+ nits.

The 720 x 1600 resolution works out to a pixel density of 270 PPI. That‘s enough sharpness for text legibility and casual media streaming. But fine details in images and video suffer relative to 1080p+ phones. At least HD+ resolution consumes less power than higher density screens.

Finally, both Motorola phones support standard 60 Hz display refresh rates without fancy high refresh rates. Response remains reasonably fluid though not as smooth as premium 120 Hz devices.

In summary, budgets phone screens must cut corners that are mostly forgivable if not expecting the vividness and fluidity of $1000+ devices like Galaxy S22 Ultra or iPhone 14 Pro Max. But they handle essential viewing tasks alright.

Next let‘s evaluate the all-important performance and hardware powering each phone…

Understanding the Performance and Hardware Differences

Now we come to one of the biggest separating factors between the Moto G Pure and Moto G Stylus – raw processing performance dictated by their internal silicon and memory allotments.

Moto G Pure Hardware

The brain behind the Moto G Pure is MediaTek‘s Helio G25 chip paired with just 2GB of RAM. This combo delivers basic app functionality but struggles severely in demanding apps and games. The meager 32GB of slower eMMC storage further bogs down speed.

Moto G Stylus Hardware

By comparison, the Moto G Stylus enjoys far snappier speeds thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 processor built using superior 8nm transistors. Together with 4GB of LPDD4x RAM and faster UFS storage, it breezes through interface navigation and social media. Light gaming works decently too.

To quantify just how vast the performance gap is, check out the Geekbench 5 benchmarks comparing key scores:

Phone Single Core Multi Core
Moto G Pure 175 813
Moto G Stylus 573 1717

As shown, the Moto G Stylus more than triples the single and multi-core output of the G Pure signaling far better overall speed potential to the end user.

Both phones at least include microSD card support for up to 512GB more affordable expandable storage. And side fingerprint sensors plus face unlock provide adequate biometric security.

But when it comes down to sustained performance, the Moto G Stylus clearly outpaces the Moto G Pure by a massive margin. Next we‘ll see how this also translates into vastly superior photographic experiences…

Comparing the Camera Setups and Image Quality

Cameras remain one of the most used and appreciated capabilities we expect from modern smartphones. Unfortunately, the cost-cutting required to hit low prices also impacts the optics and shooting competence when comparing the Moto G Pure vs Moto G Stylus.

Moto G Pure Camera Hardware

On its back, the Moto G Pure packs a rather basic 13MP f/2.2 main camera paired with a 2MP depth helper for bokeh effects. Video tops out at 1080p resolution with software stabilization. The front selfie shooter comes in at just 5MP.

In real world use, all these shooters struggle in dimmer lighting and produce softer images lacking in fine details even when adequate light is available. Without state-of-the-art processing, you can‘t expect fantastic results.

Moto G Stylus Camera Hardware

The Moto G Stylus makes photography a much bigger priority with its triple lens setup. This includes a 50MP wide f/1.9 primary cam, 8MP ultrawide module at 118 degrees, plus the same 2MP depth unit. For selfies, a beefy 16MP front cam captures far better facial clarity.

4K video capture is even possible thanks to the more advanced ISP. And AI algorithms plus RAW photo formats assist with image optimizations.

No doubt due to the surplus of megapixels and brighter optics, my testing found the Moto G Stylus capable of vastly better detailed and vivid shots compared to the Moto G Pure even in tricky lighting. This applies equally to standard and wide perspective stills plus smoother handheld footage.

If camera performance is a priority for documenting life‘s memories, the Moto G Stylus certainly carries a commanding advantage.

How‘s the Battery Life and Charging Speed?

In an era of 4K displays and advanced apps constantly pinging data, battery life concerns understandably loom large for smartphone shoppers nowadays. Affordable phones often optimize their batteries at the expense of blistering speeds.

Moto G Pure Power and Charging

A 5000 mAh pack keeps the lights on for the Moto G Pure, which Motorola rates for over a full day of mixed use. In practice I found it comfortable handles a 7am to 10pm routine unless you binge hours of video.

One cost-cutting downside is slow 5W charging that requires nearly 3 hours to fully replenish an empty battery using the stock brick. At least the handy 20W fast charging support allows quicker top-ups when buying a third party power adapter.

Moto G Stylus Power and Charging

An even larger 5,000 mAh battery gives the Moto G Stylus equally impressive if not better runtime of 1.5-2 days for conservative users. More demanding ones still get from dawn to dusk off a single charge.

Faster 10W rapid charging finally comes standard via USB-PD. And filling up the huge battery still only requires about 1.75 hours. That convenience helps offset middling charging for buyers regularly topping up overnight.

Both phones lack the wireless charging still mostly reserved for flagship devices. But their sizable internal batteries paired with smart power optimization combine to deliver wholly satisfactory endurance for budget shoppers. The Moto G Stylus ultimately wins by a hair for its extreme two day longevity potentials.

Let‘s now switch gears to discussing the Android software experience and extra features…

Reviewing the Software Experience

Since both Motorola phones run pure Android software devoid of messy carrier bloatware, their interfaces and OS capabilities are quite familiar to most users. But they land on different pages for version lineage and forward update guarantees.

Moto G Pure Software

The Moto G Pure arrived in late 2021 with Android 11 preloaded in a nearly stock configuration adding only minor Motorola enhancements. Sadly, it remains stuck there as of early 2023 with no indications Android 12 is coming let alone Android 13 down the line.

Still, core Google apps and essential system elements all work smoothly. Motorola also bakes in tricks like twisting gestures for quick actions and a peek content viewer. Overall, the software gets all jobs done with minimal fuss.

Moto G Stylus Software

Launching with Android 12, the newest Moto G Stylus offers a more modern foundation for 2023 and beyond. Motorola guarantees users can expect an OS upgrade to Android 13. That ensures another year or two of security patches and compatible functionality.

Both interface speed and consistency shine bright partly thanks to the superior Snapdragon 480 chipset optimizations. Google Discover feed integration, Dynamic Spotlight search, and other newer features play nice as well. No complaints on the software front!

For road warriors dependent on continual updates, the Moto G Stylus better safeguards feature access moving forward. But neither phone wins awards for rapid new Android builds.

Connectivity, Call Quality, and Audio Assessment

In an age when our smartphones act as mini computers in our pockets for productivity and services on the go, compromised connectivity cripples their capabilities. Let inspect how well the Moto G Pure and Moto G Stylus deliver on everyday communication fundamentals:

Networking and Wireless

You can bank on solid LTE data speeds for web browsing and standard definition video streaming on either Motorola phone thanks to compatibility with all major North American 4G bands like 2/4/5/12/66. Both also integrate baseline 5G (sub-6 GHz) network support but don‘t expect blazing mmWave performance.

Dual-band WiFi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0 round out the wireless options for home media transferring at reasonable if not blinding rates. No huge differences emerge here. However, NFC does give Moto G Stylus owners an edge for tap payments and proximity app actions.

Call Quality

Happily, call quality impresses on both models I tested thanks to extra noise cancelling microphones that reduce environmental static and distortion. Voices transmit clearly to recipients with enough volume and sidetone feedback to carry conversations even in noisy vehicles or crowds.

Beyond calls, bottom-firing speakers reach sufficiently loud volumes for personal listening without much distortion either. Just don‘t expect premium clarity and bass or stereo separation. But they drive media alright.

If fundamental communication is central to your mobile needs, both options serve admirably with the Moto G Stylus holding an edge for contactless payments.

Now let‘s conclude this comparison guide by recapping the distinguishing pros and cons before issuing my final verdict…

Moto G Pure Pros and Cons

Standout Pros:

  • Extremely affordable sub-$150 cost
  • Sleek modern visual design language
  • Good enough display for the price
  • Reliable battery life for a full day
  • Guaranteed OS updates unlikely but not impossible

Limiting Cons:

  • Weak camera performance hurts photo quality
  • Lacks NFC for contactless Google/Apple Pay
  • Charging speeds quite slow at just 5-10W
  • MediaTek processor with 2GB RAM cripples performance
  • Low starting 32GB storage without expansion

Moto G Stylus Pros and Cons

Killer Strengths:

  • Quad camera stack takes WAY better photos
  • Snappy Qualcomm chip + 4GB RAM crushes interface lag
  • Huge 128GB base storage leaves expansion room
  • Packaged-in stylus enables handwritten notes
  • Fingerprint reader enables super convenient biometric unlock

Underwhelming Weaknesses:

  • Thick bezels look a bit outdated nowadays
  • 1080p or higher resolution would be nice
  • Still limited to 10W charging speeds
  • No 5G support limits future network scaling

Conclusion: Moto G Stylus Wins as the Overall Superior Budget Phone

When all is said and done across the various hardware metrics and daily use cases, I have to declare the Moto G Stylus as the superior phone for just $50-100 bucks more. The bargain price still undercuts comparable competitors but you gain advantages like:

  • 3-4X faster processor tackling demanding apps and games
  • Massively better quad camera system with 50MP clarity
  • Effective integrated stylus for text input
  • Brighter photography and videography potentials
  • Smoother software experience thanks to Android 12

Simply put, the Moto G Stylus doesn‘t force as many painful compromises or obvious omissions to keep costs low. It retains impressive capabilities like NFC tap payments lacking in the Pure edition. And the faster siliconShould your budget allow, I can strongly recommend the Moto G Stylus as fantastic blend of solid performance, versatile utility, and affordable access nearly all consumers will appreciate.

However, for cash-strapped shoppers or kids, the Moto G Pure deserves consideration too. It nails the basics on a ultra cheap budget even if imaging and processing don‘t measure up. Think simple communication and light apps for around $120.

Both options ultimately reflect Motorola‘s continued commitment to value conscious phone buyers. I hope mapping out their differences here helps you feel confident pursuing either Moto G pick as your next affordable Android partner both in work and play!

Let me know if you have any other questions.