As full-sized desktop towers gradually fade into obscurity, mini PCs like Intel‘s NUC and the tiny Raspberry Pi are on the rise. Packed with surprising power given their diminutive dimensions, these miniature marvels deliver solid performance whether you‘re working, creating, or playing.
But should you choose an Intel NUC 13 or a Raspberry Pi for your needs? As an avid tinkerer and PC builder, allow me to be your guide through the key differences. In this epic head-to-head comparison, we‘ll contrast specs, performance benchmarks, ideal use cases, and pricing so you can determine the best option for your individual usage.
Let‘s dive in! This is going to be fun.
A Mini History Lesson
First, a quick history refresher. The Raspberry Pi dates back to 2006 when a group of Cambridge professors grew concerned over declining computing skills among young engineers.
They conceived an ultra-low-cost computer to promote deeper hands-on understanding – the sort of tinkering experience many of us fondly remember from our childhood days spent programming 80s microcomputers.
After extensive development, the first Raspberry Pi Model B launched in February 2012 priced at just $35. A surprise hit, it kickstarted a global maker movement based around inexpensive, credit card-sized computing.
Intel‘s Next Unit of Computing (NUC) debuted shortly after in 2013, but with a different philosophy compared to the Pi. Rather than an edgy developer board, NUCs targeted mainstream consumers wanting desktop PC power in a minimal footprint.
With its refined aesthetic and compact dimensions, Intel designed NUCs to integrate seamlessly into home theater setups and business environments where space comes at a premium.
And over ensuing generations, both platforms saw substantial upgrades…
While conceived for different audiences, either mini machine makes an compelling option if desktop power punches matter more to you than absolute portability. Let‘s scrutinize how today‘s models stack up!
NUC 13 vs. Raspberry Pi 4: Key Specs Face-Off
On paper, the NUC 13 and Raspberry Pi 4 share little in common beyond diminutive proportions. Peering past their pint-sized exteriors reveals pronounced performance differences within:
Specification | Intel NUC 13 | Raspberry Pi 4 Model B |
---|---|---|
Dimensions | 6.93" x 5.98" x 4.21" 3.19 lbs |
3.37” x 2.25” x 0.56” 1.17 lbs |
CPU | 13th Gen Intel Core i7-1360P 12 Cores / 16 Threads Up to 5GHz (P-Core) |
Broadcom BCM2711B0 ARM Cortex-A72 1.5 GHz Quad-Core |
GPU | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | Broadcom VideoCore VI |
Memory | Up to 64GB DDR4-3200 | 8GB LPDDR4-3200 |
Storage | M.2 PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD Up to 1TB |
MicroSD Card Slot Up to 256GB |
Front Ports | 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A |
2x USB 3.0 Type-A 2x Micro HDMI |
Rear Ports | 1x HDMI 2.1 1x Thunderbolt 4 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A 2.5GbE LAN |
2x USB 2.0 Gigabit Ethernet 3.5mm Audio/Composite |
OS Installed | Windows 11 Pro | Raspberry Pi OS (Linux) |
With bleeding-edge 13th Gen Intel processing power, generous RAM capacity, fast modern connectivity, and abundant solid state storage, the NUC 13 dominates nearly every category besides physical size.
But as we‘ll see next, turning specs into real-world performance involves considerably more nuance. Different use cases favor one platform over the other…
Intel NUC 13: An Effortless Powerhouse for Work and Play
Fresh out the box, the Intel NUC 13 delivers smooth, snappy responsiveness for productivity, creativity, and entertainment thanks to its cutting-edge 1360P 12-core/16-thread processor with up to 5GHz peak Turbo clock speeds.
Augmenting its multi-core muscle, Iris Xe integrated graphics capably handle 4K video editing, 3D CAD modeling, and even entry-level gaming without breaking a sweat or requiring noisy dedicated graphics.
For storage, NUCs support one PCIe 4.0 M.2 SSD alongside an optional 2.5" SATA drive. Transferring files thus feels wonderfully swift. Networking likewise impresses courtesy of premium 2.5Gb ethernet and Wi-Fi 6E.
With extensive connectivity options including Thunderbolt 4, HDMI 2.1, and a SD card reader, hooking up peripherals proves fuss-free. And it‘s all wrapped in a handsome, versatile 6.93 x 5.98 x 4.21 inch chassis styled to blend into modern workplaces and living rooms.
Ideal Intel NUC 13 Uses:
- Primary or secondary PC for productivity and internet
- Plex media server or client
- Light gaming and streaming up to 4K 60fps
- VR experience (with optional eGPU)
- Digital signage player
- Compact business desktop
For creatives, the NUC 13’s midrange Iris Xe graphics capably drive photo editing in Photoshop and video production in Premiere Pro. Some entry-level 3D rendering also fits within its capabilities.
Gamers can leverage the Intel NUC 13 for older titles or cloud gaming services like Xbox Game Pass. Modern AAA games at maximum detail exceed its limits, so pair the NUC with an external GPU instead for cutting-edge immersion. Overall, this pint-sized powerhouse masters nearly any conventional computing scenario with aplomb.
Performance Benchmarks:
- Geekbench 5 (Single / Multi Core): 1,919 / 9,100 points
- Cinebench R23 (Single/ Multi Core): 1,988 / 15,191 points
- 3DMark Time Spy (GPU): 3,012 points
But computing with a NUC differs greatly from the unique tinkering experience fostered by Raspberry Pi. And for electronics makers, programmers, and hobbyists, that critical distinction really matters…
Raspberry Pi – Tiny Tool for Tinkerers
Whereas Intel designed its NUC line first and foremost for conventional tech consumers, the Raspberry Pi Foundation built their signature platform exclusively for hands-on experimentation and programming education.
Roughly the dimensions of a credit card at just 3.37 x 2.25 x 0.56 inches, even the flagship Pi 4 Model B gets by with a mere Broadcom BCM2711 system-on-chip (SoC) featuring 1.5GHz ARM processing, VideoCore VI graphics, and 1 to 8GB LPDDR4 system memory.
Storage relies entirely on the microSD slot – booting Linux-based Raspberry Pi OS from one card before adding a second for long term file retention. Networking can be wired via Gigabit Ethernet or wireless through USB Wi-Fi adapters.
Video outputs to monitors and TVs using the two micro HDMI ports, while USB and GPIO pins facilitate connecting keyboards, controllers, and electronic components for custom projects.
What can you do with a Raspberry Pi? Nearly anything you can imagine if willing to get creative!
- Custom retro gaming rig
- Robot brain
- Smart home hub
- Ad-blocking Pi-hole
- Network monitoring
- Low-power server
- Cryptocurrency node
- Magic mirror
- Mini arcade machine
- IoT prototyping
- And much more…
Beginners value the Pi‘s convenience for quickly setting up Minecraft servers, media centers, network-wide ad blockers, and classic game emulators.
Meanwhile, electronics makers harness its programmable GPIO pins for relay control automation in homes, factories, farms, and commercial buildings.
For coders, its flexibility with Linux programming languages like Python and community-driven package manager pip fosters agile Internet of Things (IoT) prototyping.
And even advanced users capitalize on the Pi‘s low thermal footprint and cost-effectiveness for clustering. Linked in groups to divide specialized workloads amongst themselves, racks upon racks of Pi have proven viable for worldwide distributed computing initiatives.
Benchmarking the Pi 4:
- Geekbench 5 (Single / Multi Core): 358 / 1,356 points
- Stock Sysbench CPU test: 2,241 points
- 1080p H.264 video encoding: 20 fps
Clearly no speed demon, the Pi 4 instead empowers curious minds to peek under the hood. Tinkering breeds operational confidence and valuable troubleshooting skills transferable into childhood STEM education before translating eventually into full-fledged technology careers.
Pricing Breakdown: Mini PCs Big on Value
In an era where mainstream computer hardware often demands premium prices, both the NUC 13 and Raspberry Pi 4 deliver outstanding value. Let‘s break down costs:
System | Base Price | Essential Extras | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Intel NUC 13 (Core i5 Model) |
$429+ | OS, RAM, SSD | ~$800+ |
Raspberry Pi 4 Model B 8GB | $75 | Power, case, microSD card | ~$150 |
The raw platform cost clearly favors the Pi for those working on a budget. But hopping onto Amazon reveals preconfigured NUC 13 bundles with Windows 11, SSD, and memory from just $799. Given its 12-core desktop performance, that actually represents reasonable value, essentially matching more basic mid-tower desktops.
Factor in the additional hardware and accessories recommended below for enhanced real-world functionality, and costs work out as:
System | Extras | Price |
---|---|---|
Intel NUC 13 | 128GB SSD: $35 16GB RAM: $50 Total: $100 |
$900 |
Raspberry Pi 4 | Official Case: $10 128GB MicroSD Card: $16 1TB Portable HDD: $47 Mini Keyboard + Mouse Combo: $29 |
$182 |
Even for a fully built-out setup with abundant solid state and external storage supplemented by handy input peripherals, the Pi manages to keep total expenditures impressively low.
Clearly cost favors the Raspberry Pi, often massively so when factoring TCO across 5 years of ownership. But peak performance lies with the NUC 13. Choose wisely based on budget!
Pros and Cons: Which Thumbnail PC Reigns Supreme?
We‘ve covered specs, performance, use cases, and pricing comparisons in depth. Now let‘s summarize the overall pros and cons of Intel‘s NUC 13 vs the credit card-sized Raspberry Pi 4 to establish definitively which micro machine best suits specific needs.
Intel NUC 13 Pros:
- Class-leading desktop performance from 13th Gen Intel Core i7 processor
- Abundant RAM capacity and wicked fast M.2 NVMe storage
- Plentiful ports including Thunderbolt 4 and 2.5GbE networking
- Capable 1080p and 4K gaming integrated graphics
- Stylish, versatile design fits anywhere
- Windows 11 Pro delivers familiar experience
- Just plug in and use without any specialized know-how
Intel NUC 13 Cons:
- Premium price that can quickly escalate with accessories
- Fan produces light but audible whir during heavy loads
- Limited scope for hacking or hardware customization
- Overkill specs for basic education or IoT use
Raspberry Pi 4 Pros:
- Ridiculously affordable starting at just $35 ($182 fully loaded)
- Fosters hands-on learning of Linux and programming
- Easy to incorporate into custom electronics projects
- Vibrant Raspberry Pi user community for troubleshooting and project guidance
- Readily scalable into clusters for distributed computing applications
- Low power draw and heat generation
Raspberry Pi Cons:
- Underpowered ARM chipset inadequate for intensive desktop workloads
- Steep learning curve negotiating Linux and figuring out hardware quirks
- No built-in Wi-Fi or Bluetooth – requires USB dongles
- Won‘t readily run complex Windows/Mac software natively
Verdict: Two Tiny Dynamos Delivering Differently
The Intel NUC 13 and Raspberry Pi 4 take profoundly unique approaches toward crafting a complete mini PC experience.
For most mainstream users seeking a versatile primary home office and entertainment machine in a compact footprint, I recommend the Intel NUC 13 without hesitation. Just connect a monitor and peripherals then enjoy!
But for anyone yearning to peek under the hood by picking up coding skills or building custom electronics projects on a tight budget, the Raspberry Pi 4 can‘t be beaten. Its slick community support helps smooth the Linux learning process too.
Either way, both the NUC and Pi pack tremendous power relative into super small frames measuring just inches per side rather than feet. So whether you prioritize plug-and-play functionality or hands-dirty hacking potential, rest assured a properly tiny PC exists to suit your specific needs!
I‘m confident the extensive comparison above armored with key benchmarks and real-world context provides sufficient insight to pick the right pint-sized contender. Still have questions? Fire away in the comments section!